US Home Sales Slow – indicating slow recovery

Recent data coming out of the US shows that prices for residential property seem to be stabilising, but that inventory rates are staying high, and even increasing slightly.

What does this all mean? There has been much said about the type of recovery the US is expected to have. Will it be a robust ‘boom’ as has occurred in the most recent recessions or a double dip recession or perhaps a slow and almost stagnant period of growth (similar to Japan’s economy over the past 10 years).

I think it is becoming clear that there is not going to be a strong recovery – or a ‘boom’. Whilst the jobless rate remains so high (9.9%) I can not see any strong growth in house prices. Looking at the most recent data from the Bureauof Labor Statistics, there really are mixed signally of what employment in the US is doing.

One one hand the jobless rate has increased (9.7% to 9.9%) however the participation rate has increased (.3%) indicating more people were looking for work, and yet the long term unemployed (known as discouraged workers) has increased by almost 5000,000 in the past 12 months.

For a solid rebound in home prices to occur  simply more people need to be employed. The US love of owning property has not changed. The dream of owning ones own castle will be flickering away, however that dream is just that, a dream, unless they can have stable employment.

So I have come to the conclusion that we can expect slow or non-existent growth in US residential house prices at least for the short to medium term.

See here for a press release from the National Association of Realtors on this point.

And visit here for Labor Statistics.

Interest Rates Up In Australia Again

Once again the Reserve Bank of Australia has raised interest rates by .25%. Recent business survey’s show that in general confidence from the business sector is still not great, so perhaps some interesting times ahead.

Dubai Investor Wins in Court

Interesting article published recently on the site www.propertycommunity.com referring to an investors win in a court case against a well known Dubai Developer ACI. The investor successful achieved an order for the refund of DHS 1 million invested in 2007 for 2 commercial units that are now 20 months behind there due date.

I am sure Developers (and Investors) across the UAE are looking into this judgement in depth as there are a huge number of delayed or late projects in the region.

What is comforting for all investors however is the fact that with this judgement the Court has shown that it is going to adjudicate fairly in property disputes. I think everyone was concerned that the judiciary would have been under considerable pressure to ‘support’ developers to provide stability to the property markets in the region. The fact that they will pass judgement against developers in this way does cause a risk of significant capital flight from the region, something it really doesn’t need right now. However I believe that all investors should take comfort from the fact that the decision was made notwithstanding this fact, and that ultimately the fair and right decision was made irrespective  of extraneous events.

This should give all investors a great deal of comfort and I believe shows a level of maturity in Dubai’s overall governance that many people have been concerned may not existed.

You can read the article here.

Qld Government to amend legislation on project covenants

Property Council Press Release:

“The Queensland Government will amend the legislation to reinstate the right of developers to enforce covenants that are not in conflict with achieving improved environmental outcomes.

 We welcome this announcement by the Government and acknowledge the work of the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning Stirling Hinchliffe and his Cabinet colleagues in recognising this as a major issue for the industry and moving to make appropriate changes.

 This is a major win for the Property Council and we look forward to working with Minister Hinchliffe in identifying appropriate amendments.”

Tallest tower in the world opens today

The long-awaited opening of the Burj Dubai is scheduled to take place today.

Although the final height is not yet known, it is expected to be over 800 metres high and substantially the tallest building in the world.

It also seems that the opening may help the level of confidence in and about Dubai. Dubai has been hit incredibly hard by the GFC, and it badly needs a boost in confidence for its residents and the thousands of foreign investors who own property in Dubai. Perhaps the launch of Burj Dubai, coming at the start of a new year and as the GFC ends, heralds the start of a new era in Dubai’s growth. Lets hope so.

Burj Dubai the worlds tallest tower to open on December 2

The Burj Dubai will officially open to the public on December 2, to coincide with UAE National Day, Arabian Business can reveal.

The opening date of the world’s tallest building has been a closely guarded secret for years – however, a senior architect working on the project has confirmed that December 2 has been set aside for the opening.

The Armani Hotel, part of the building, will take its first guests on the same day.

Ceremonies to mark the launch are also being planned for December 2. It is not yet clear whether other parts of the tower will be fully accessible.

“This will be a huge achievement and a big celebration for the UAE and for Emaar, particularly as it’s UAE National Day. It will be the first time the public can enter the building,” said the architect.

Emaar has always maintained it will not comment on the specific opening date and has also been tight-lipped over the final height of the Burj Dubai, which is thought to have topped out earlier this year at 818 metres.

Source: arabianbusiness.com

Dubai Property Sector continues to consolidate

Further mergers and consolidations are bringing clarity to the Dubai property sector as developers look to restructure debts and the government reorganizes developers under it’s umbrella.

At it’s high RERA, the Real Estate Regulatory Authority, recorded 447 approved developers, however this number is now being scaled back as it developers look to best manage assets and resources and deliver on projects, such as middle income housing which have greater momentum amidst the current economic climate.

Emaar, the largest developer in the Middle East, and now close to completion of the worlds tallest tower, Burj Dubai, stated last week that it is in talks to acquire the property interests of Dubai Holdings. This would bring three large entities – Sama Dubai, Tatweer and Dubai Properties – under the Emaar brand, creating the largest property developer in the MENA region.

“Consolidating these three companies with Emaar is a natural progression in the evolution of the Dubai real estate landscape, providing benefits to all stakeholders,” said Mohammed al Gergawi, the chairman of Dubai Holding.

Dubai World, also last week said that it was in the process of consolidating Leisurecorp, Dubai Maritime City and Dubai Multi Commodities Centre under the Nakheel brand.

“The move aims at consolidating activities of the same nature to better accommodate current market conditions and optimise resources and expertise,” a Dubai World spokeswoman said.

Also still on the cards, is the continued discussion of a merger between Deyaar Development and Union Properties.

“Consolidation is gathering momentum, driven by structural, market and regulatory factors,” said Dirk Buchta, the Middle East managing director of the management consultancy firm AT Kearney, in a report this month. The firm is said to be advising Deyaar and Union Properties on merger options.

From it’s high of 447 registered property developers, it will certainly be interesting to see where we end up. However, one thing is for certain, these mergers are for the good of the Dubai property sector in the short, medium and long term and will help deliver stability for both these companies and their clients and investors.

So, the only question is, who’s next?

A 3rd wave of foreclosures in the US heralds more bad news for the world economy?

A recent article on MSN Money (link here) by Michael Brush discusses the coming 3rd wave of foreclosures – namely housing distress and foreclosures from prime lenders. These are people who have never come under the banner of  sub-prime mortgagee’s. These loans are thought of as your traditional house mortgage starting with a significant deposit and home owner equity. Economists have been discussing for some time the possibility that these prime borrowers would ultimately come under distress just as sub-prime borrowers have. It would seem that that is now happening.

So what does this mean to the world economy? We are seeing signs that growth in China and India are returning somewhat to previous levels, or so it would seem. The questions remains is that is this growth being driven by underlying demand or the build up of depleted inventory. Once inventory levels return to normal for these companies, growth of any kind will be driven by demand. 

As the US represents almost a quarter of world GDP (reference wikipedia), continued and extended weakness in the US economy, leading to significantly reduced demand, must continue to push down growth rates in all economies, including China and India. Short term stimulus packages driving short term domestic demand will only last so long in these economies.

Further we have the prospect now of interest rate increases in the US. 30 year fixed rate mortgages in the US  are now at 5.45%, up from around 5% in April. This is primarily being driven by concern over the US Bond Market where yeilds have been increasing over the past few months on concern of the US Federal Reserve’s ability to continue purchasing bonds.

There is no doubt the rate of decline in almost all of the benchmarks for the economy is slowing. No doubt they will soon bottom. The question will be however how long until we see real growth again. A turn around to seeing actual growth in employment numbers for example. We then have the specter of interest rate rises being driven by the huge borrowings of governments around the world, immediately stunting any possible growth as it tries to emerge.

So where will this leave us? Some econmists believe that the world ecomony, or at least many of the developed economies, may end up with a Japanese still ‘lost decade’ – long periods of no or very limited growth. Personally I am starting to lean towards a 70’s style era of boom and bust. I can see many economies having an inflation lead boom followed by a series of busts, with quite wild cyclical variations.

Which property markets are most susceptible to big price falls

In a post back in April I talked about the forclosure rates in the US and how these were predominently (87%) occuring in a select number of states. It is an interesting paper and well worth a read, but todays post is about another item that really caught my attention in that paper, namely the relationship between foreclosures and the reduction in housing affordability leading up to the crash. So this got me thinking. One would assume a relatively linear link between falling housing affordability and foeclosures. A simple eqaution – when housing affordability falls, an increasing % of the individual or family’s income must go to meeting mortgage payments.

Another report on topic, the 5th Annual Demographis International Housing Affordability Survey said:


“Much of the reduction in prices has occurred in markets that have experienced the greatest loss in housing affordability in the past. The largest house price decreases over the past year occurred in susceptible Ireland, New Zealand and the United Kingdom, where housing affordability in nearly all markets had reached “severely unaffordable” (Median Multiple over 5.0). In the United States, the house price declines have been far higher in those markets that had experienced the greatest housing price increases, while markets that experienced much smaller price increases experienced far more modest losses.” For the full report go to  http://www.demographia.com/dhi-ix2005q3.pdf

And yet in the University of Virgina report, the writers find the following:

“Restoring balance between house prices and incomes is complicated by imbalances between a shortage in supply of dwellings where people prefer to live and an overabundance of dwellings in other locations. Metropolitan areas vary in the range in their political jurisdictions of house value to family income and in foreclosure rates. San Francisco provides an extreme, but clear, example.

In 2007 the ratio of house values to family incomes was excessive in each jurisdiction. The lowest house value to family income ratio, 5.7 to 1, was in Solano County which also had the highest foreclosure rate, 3.69 percent of housing units. The house value to income ratio suggests that Solano County on the edge of the metropolitan area had more dwellings relative to demand than other jurisdictions. The high foreclosure rate indicated that buyers’ capacity to pay mortgages was fragile, and, perhaps, that an accumulation of foreclosures hampered new sales.

In contrast, the highest house value to income ratios were in central jurisdictions—City of San Francisco, Marin County, and San Mateo County. They had house value to income ratios of 9.7, 8.5, and 8.5 to 1. But their foreclosure rates were the three lowest in the metropolitan area. Perhaps more residents in those jurisdictions had purchased when prices and mortgages were lower. Or, perhaps owners unable to pay mortgage costs were able to sell at acceptable prices because demand was strong (Appendix 1 San Francisco Metropolitan Area).” 

This shows quite clearly that housing affordability alone is not a guide to the success or fail of a specific market.

So what can we use as a guide. This is by no means meant to be a conclusion, as from my readings no one is really sure, but here are my ideas:

1. Housing Affordability. This has to be a factor. A Housing Affordability drops, so must demand.

2. Purchaser Profile. Without doubt foreclosures have been high in markets with high % of first home buyers. These transactions in recent times are characterised by large incentives from governments and very low (or non-existent) deposits (and therefore high mortgages). If we think of a home owners propsensity to work through troubled economic times (lets call it their Home Ownership Price Elasticity – HOPE), it is lowest in these purchasers. Owners who have significant equity in their home and a history of saving, obviously have a greater ability to weather financial difficulties, which reduces foreclosure rates and hence provides stability to prices.